John's posts with tag: harry potter

What are tags? You can give your posts a "tag", which is like a keyword. Tags help you find content which has something in common. You can assign as many tags as you wish to each post.
View posts by people in your network with tag harry potter
Blog EntryHarry Potter 7 (spoilers)Aug 4, '07 8:16 PM
for everyone
Just finished Deathly Hallows after it finally arrived in the mail a couple days ago.

Jeez, from the number of dead characters, Rowling could have just cut to the chase and dropped a nuke on Hogwarts. I was pretty surprised at the number of casualties and some mild profanity, considering this is (or was) essentially intended to be a children's book.

What amused me, though, was how -- after the hissy-fit the Bible-thumpers were having over Harry Potter originally -- Rowling (who by the way is Anglican -- I can't resist pointing that out ;-) ) put some pretty overt Christian themes into the final book. Hell, she practically could have tattooed "JESUS CHRIST" right onto Harry's forehead. "King's Cross", eh? Sacrificing himself so others could live? Making Dumbledore into a God the Father-type figure? Being resurrected? And lots of smaller things, like making a cross for Mad-Eye and burying his eye, visiting the little church, and so on?

Bless her, though, for pretty much nuking any chance of a prequel or sequel. I enjoyed the series capitally, but I think if I see any sequel or prequel or additional books, I will scream.

All in all, I enjoyed the book. And I shed a tear for Snape -- I knew all along that he'd turn out to be a good guy (it just had to be that way), but seeing it turn out that way was very satisfying. Paradoxically his death made it that much better -- having him reconcile with Harry would have made it corny, and Rowling found a way to make it work better IMO.

I also have to say I was disappointed, but maybe also relieved in a way, that BoE's theory about Dumbledore turned out to be false. It was such a perfect theory that it was maybe too good to be true, but at the same time in hindsight it was perhaps also corny to bring back Dumbledore -- too Hollywood. So compliments to Rowling for letting dead people stay dead.

There is only one major glitch in the story AFAICS: Why didn't Harry see the one Death Eater on his Marauder Map when he and Luna got surprised by her? That totally floored me.

Blog EntryHarry Potter and the Bride of Ethelred, ReduxMar 25, '07 3:48 PM
for everyone
Before the new Harry Potter book comes out, I'd like to remind y'all about this post, where BoE's theory about Dumbledore's death -- or lack thereof -- is explained.

Here is the theory again:

*** SPOILERS *** SPOILERS *** SPOILERS ***
If you are one of the 1.75 people left on Earth who has not yet read Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Paisley Prince, I suggest you IMMEDIATELY depart this Journal at once. Or else.

Anyway.

BoE had a rather interesting idea as to the real meaning of the end of HPATHBP (pronounced "thbpbpbpbpbt"). And now that I think about it, Rowling is dropping major clues all through the end, so I think she's on to something.

Her theory: Dumbledore is an Animagus who can turn into a phoenix.

Think about it. Dumbledore keeps a phoenix as a pet (Fawkes); Fawkes laments for him; his burial was in (white, obviously magical) flames that "obscure his body"; as the flames subside and before the tomb appears, a phoenix takes off (it doesn't say it was Fawkes, either).

Here is the exact passage from the funeral:

Then several people screamed. Bright, white flames had erupted around Dumbledore's body and the table upon which it lay: higher and higher they rose, obscuring the body. White smoke spiralled into the air and made strange shapes: Harry thought, for one heart-stopping moment, that he saw a phoenix fly joyfully into the blue, but next second the fire had vanished. In its place was a white marble tomb, encasing Dumbledore's body and the table on which he had rested.


If true, Dumbledore is indeed the greatest wizard EVAR, because it would be a stroke of genius. He's not exactly immortal, but certainly it'd nearly impossible to kill him.

Dumbledore may thus have known that the potion covering the horcrux was deadly, and known that as a phoenix he could survive it.

Snape could also have known this and "killed" Dumbledore fully aware that he would come back. There have been hints that Dumbledore and Snape share some secrets (none of the other members of the Order seem to know why Dumbledore trusts Snape so much): so it would make sense that Snape would thus be able to kill Dumbledore. Snape also had ample opportunity to kill Harry at the very end, but didn't.

It adds up very well indeed. Maybe too well...


Now, Rowling has said adamantly that Dumbledore is dead. Thing is, he'd have to die to be reborn as a phoenix, so it still lines up with her statement. She has also hinted that Dumbledore will make "some kind of appearance" in the seventh book. Well, him being reborn would be a hell of an appearance. And it would return Snape back to his original pattern of appearing evil but always turning out to be good in the end after all.

© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help